An easy glance at my history on this website will confirm the reality that I’m a huge enthusiast of union studies. I am fascinated because of the techniques we just be sure to apply research to sex and love, in hopes of a single time being able to explain the mystical methods of the center.
Some researches provide interesting insight into modern-day mating traditions, but some (or even many) are, as TruTv.com publisher Nick Nadel puts it, “forehead-slappingly evident.” Nadel obtained a list of 10 scientific studies that most undoubtedly fall under the second group. Here are a few of shows:
Dubious research #1: scientists at Radboud University of Nijmegen from inside the Netherlands discovered that males tend to have difficulty carrying out intellectual tasks after interacting with members of the exact opposite sex. This means, Nadel claims, “interacting with women makes males dumb.”
Nadel’s simply take: “As obvious studies go, this option is up indeed there with ‘people often bend the reality on the internet.'” It ought ton’t simply take a study staff to find out that men’s brains have distracted around ladies.
My Thoughts: i need to side with Nadel about one. It shouldn’t arrive as a shock that men’s room minds have somewhat addled around attractive ladies, and that I guess that a report on ladies brains would find they have been just as addled around appealing men.
Questionable research no. 2: based on the findings of just one of OkCupid’s many studies about OkTrends blog site, people who make use of Twitter everyday have shorter connections than others that do not.
Nadel’s Take: OkCupid does not actually believe their own findings. a spokesperson for your web site said “unfortuitously, there is no way to inform that is dumping which here; perhaps the Twitterati tend to be more annoying or simply more flighty than everybody else.” Put differently, there is no actual proof that Twitter has anything to do with all the period of a relationship.
My personal mind: In the event that people in charge of the research are not even yes exactly what their own conclusions are, they truly are most likely not well worth spending a lot focus on. The OkTrends scientific studies are several enjoyable, but they are certainly not the conclusive word on things matchmaking.
Dubious research # 3: the duration of a man’s ring finger is related to his appeal, per a team at college of Geneva in Switzerland. The proportion that compares the size of a person’s directory little finger to their ring-finger is recognized as “2D:4D.”
Nadel’s Take: the research claims that guys with longer ring fingers have “rugged, caveman-like” confronts. “Right,” Nadel claims, “because females always choose the caveman appearance. It is not like several of all of our top male stars are non-threatening, baby-faced types or such a thing.”
My personal views: many reports examining female belief of male attractiveness found that women tend to be drawn to distinct men during various levels of these menstrual rounds. A woman could, for that reason, be interested in both “baby-faced kinds” and “rugged cavemen” during the period of monthly. And also as much given that fingers get, “correlation is not causation” – though there is a connection between finger size and attractiveness, one does not fundamentally cause the various other.
Stay tuned in for much more frivolous conclusions and silly researches from Nick Nadel and TruTV…
